Sex and the City thoughts
Mar. 31st, 2020 05:18 pmI was 17 and in a struggling relationship. I idealized Happily Ever After with The One. I hated Big - he was terrible and cold. I hated cold men. I loved Aidan and Steve. I couldn't believe Carrie would hurt Aidan so much.
Eventually I started getting the seasons on DVD (2007-2010), and a clearer picture started to emerge. Smith and Harry were added to my list of amazing men. Still hated Big. Started to see that Carrie was very problematic. By the time I saw the first movie, I could NOT forgive Carrie for what she did to Big (and I was pretty pissed at Charlotte too for stopping him from explaining). As if either of them are perfect. Obviously the whole movie plot wouldn't exist without Carrie running away, but fuck them both. I also hated how dirty they did Smith. They made him callous. The show ends with a patient Smith telling a recovering-from-chemo Samantha he loved her after flying back from the movie set. Movie Smith is wrapped up in himself and a bored and neglected Samantha leaves him.
The second movie is just stupid, other than Charlotte's parenting difficulties and part of Big's handling of Carrie telling him she kissed Aidan - the part where he says it really tore him up and really just, how he processed in a very true-to-Big way... giving her a "Reminder that I'm married" ring is wildly unlike either of them - Carrie does not want to be "owned" and Big doesn't give a fuck about proving anything.
Anyway - someone in ONTD shared this article. And it really made me reflect on the show and its impact on me.
Carrie fell under the thrall of Mr. Big, the sexy, emotionally withholding forty-three-year-old financier played by Chris Noth. From then on, pleasurable as “Sex and the City” remained, it also felt designed to push back at its audience’s wish for identification, triggering as much anxiety as relief. It switched the romantic comedy’s primal scene, from “Me, too!” to “Am I like her?” A man practically woven out of red flags, Big wasn’t there to rescue Carrie; instead, his “great love” was a slow poisoning.
After watching through several times, I don't actually think Big was made of red flags at all. As a 32-year-old, Carrie is my age when the show starts. Carrie is immature and plays a lot of games. She expects Big to intuit everything she needs and throws tantrums when he can't. When he confronts her directly, she deflects. He wasn't there to rescue Carrie, though several times he does offer to. She says he doesn't chase her, but he does - just on his own time, like everything else in his life.
This summary is on-point. Though I think Carrie is fake a LOT of the time. I don't think Aidan was "good" and Big was "bad." Though I do have a lot of negative feelings about Big's coercion of Carrie in the elevator, Carrie had been avoiding Big because she knew she wanted him too. Aidan, the first go around, was presented as very pure. And that made the pain all the bigger. Although I'd like to point out, while the affair Carrie and Big have seems to stretch over quite some time (and again, feels pretty realistic in many ways), the reality is they were only messing around for about a month. Affairs are rarely that short-lived. Just saying.
The way the Aidan-Carrie-Big triangle played out the second time is honestly super-realistic in a lot of ways, in my experience. Aidan's remaining trauma and Carrie's desire to stay friends with Big hit directly home for me. I'd say most relationships are not stable or trusting enough to make it work, but it's exactly how I wanted things to play out for me. Well, plus open relationship. Carrie and Aidan should have definitely worked on the relationship in therapy instead of needling each other for however long, and Aidan obviously needed individual therapy as well to deal with his trust issues.
Her friends went through changes, too, often upon being confronted with their worst flaws—Charlotte’s superficiality, Miranda’s caustic tongue, Samantha’s refusal to be vulnerable. In a departure from nearly all earlier half-hour comedies, the writers fully embraced the richness of serial storytelling. In a movie we go from glare to kiss in two hours. “Sex and the City” was liberated from closure, turning “once upon a time” into a wry mantra, treating its characters’ struggles with a rare mixture of bluntness and compassion. It was one of the first television comedies to let its characters change in serious ways, several years before other half-hour comedies, like “The Office,” went and stole all the credit.
^^^ Definitely agree. I think the growth experienced by the characters is true to human nature and very relatable.
Most unusually, the characters themselves were symbolic... the four friends operated as near-allegorical figures, pegged to contemporary debates about women’s lives, mapped along three overlapping continuums. The first was emotional: Carrie and Charlotte were romantics; Miranda and Samantha were cynics. The second was ideological: Miranda and Carrie were second-wave feminists, who believed in egalitarianism; Charlotte and Samantha were third-wave feminists, focused on exploiting the power of femininity, from opposing angles. The third concerned sex itself. At first, Miranda and Charlotte were prudes, while Samantha and Carrie were libertines. Unsettlingly, as the show progressed, Carrie began to glide toward caution, away from freedom, out of fear.
The show’s basic value system aligns with Carrie: romantic, second-wave, libertine. But “Sex and the City” ’s real strength was its willingness not to stack the deck: it let every side make a case, so that complexity carried the day. When Carrie and Aidan break up, they are both right. When Miranda and Carrie argue about her move to Paris, they are both right. The show’s style could be brittle, but its substance was flexible, in a way that made the series feel peculiarly broad-ranging, covering so much ground, so fleetly, that it became easy to take it for granted.
These last two paragraphs, I think, perfectly capture why I keep coming back to the show. Relationships are complex, and the characters are not always right. They make stupid decisions and have bad opinions. They are judgmental, naive a-holes. There is so much gray. The assumed tropes of high school sweethearts that live happily ever after and never fuck up and never hurt each other are not *real* like this show was. Multiple people can be right in any given situation, and yet everyone can still get hurt.
And then, in the final round, “Sex and the City” pulled its punches, and let Big rescue Carrie. It honored the wishes of its heroine, and at least half of the audience, and it gave us a very memorable dress, too. But it also showed a failure of nerve, an inability of the writers to imagine, or to trust themselves to portray, any other kind of ending—happy or not. And I can’t help but wonder: What would the show look like without that finale? What if it were the story of a woman who lost herself in her thirties, who was changed by a poisonous, powerful love affair, and who emerged, finally, surrounded by her friends? Who would Carrie be then?
The first time I watched the series, I was so mad that she ended up with Big. After several watch-throughs, I came around. Again, I don't think Big was poisonous. He always loved Carrie, but he was a white man used to being in power/getting his way/being selfish and she intimidated and confused him with her own brand of self-importance. He came around - he experienced a lot of growth in the show as well. Carrie going to Paris was a dumbass idea. She'd already seen that Aleksandr put work first - why was she surprised? I think Big chasing after Carrie to the end fit exactly with his M.O. And I loved how the other characters played out too - Charlotte and Harry and new baby (flying in the face of her ex husband's POS mother's opinions on adoption), Smith softening up Samantha's refusal to be vulnerable, Miranda finally acknowledging the importance of family to her.
I dunno, there's so much about the show that aged super poorly (or was just poorly done to begin with), but the overarching story and themes still sit deep with me :)